Time and spirited negotiations happen on internet fora regarding a study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) and karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As characteristically happens, some of the discussants began to branch to other negative discussions which had nothing related to all the first questions or themes along with some even became a little resolved and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been required in order to get to the underside of matters and where sometimes a topic has been discussed on several distinct boards and several topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing has been really resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those topics coming again and again again and directing people to writings etc.. Unfortunately, the yahoo forums/fora are such that just limited hunting of past messages is possible without losing most of one's hair, and the archives are often maintained on another yahoo site so this will not help matters when everybody wants is to have a quick summary of what the others are already using and if possible their reasons for adopting a certain location! This latter usually brings about more gall than good information though the intention of the person posing the question might have been quite noble and maybe not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, across the path of this former quest, still another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the heart of jyotish and have also been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic charts. This really is some thing which is found in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of the earliest members at the discussion who finally admitted to such being the case. I myself, though myself not that mature, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and therefore on and much more importantly had commented on these charts in his own reading. kalyan matka panel chart Therefore, at the least a lot of people were utilizing varga-charts even a handful of hundred decades ago and possibly even just before these times.
Somewhere throughout the conversation, in another of those lists, a number of the associates made available an article in which the writer had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used in a graph format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the important and applicable matter of these technical merits of using of navamsha varga as a second chart. A couple of individuals requested for accusations in classics which indicates that early jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra must be properly used along with varga placements should only be used for discovering the strengths of planets etc..
This was really true and also a positive step forward in the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing the point that BPHS was not original and was perhaps not a good classic and compiled by one or even a group of'latter day saints' [my term, not the original poster's!] In Jyotish and consequently cannot be treated as being a classic. Apparently, there was some support to this could possibly be similarly expected if someone were to create a comment that Jyotish was only a derivative of astrology which the army that was included with Alexander attracted to India. A topic that has been acknowledged to attract even sedate jyotishis on the"war-path!"
To those who were interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be properly used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of corrupt understanding of the classics which themselves many concur may not have lived in pure form [although a few of them have thankfully survived in pretty great shape1]. Underlying that is the view some can harbor that, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of the complete body while the underwater 9/10th is largely lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas and a number of the secret documents which exist nevertheless jealously guarded by the custodian families. I don't know how much with the iceberg postulate is established facts and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of the flow of thought, vargas MUST simply be used as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also for your consideration of the deities and primal forces people represent however, maybe not at the form of a horoscope and clearly no critical consideration has to be given to aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would maintain, for instance, that while the second house lord in navamsha is a significant indicator, the simple fact it is set in the second navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd house in navamsha chart) isn't significant. Or, for example, when Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, the two planets are not related (though they'd be portrayed to be conjoined in exactly the same navamsha varga in a navamsha chart).
(b) Irrespective of whether specifically clarified or not, the other stream of believing maintains that varga kundalis have an important function to play at Jyotish and potentially are of significant usefulness in differentiating chief mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, by way of instance, would hold significant sway within matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha graph would be of similar import at the study of kids in a particular nativity's reading. All these Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.
There seemed to be a few different people who entirely denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or there were other reasons, known only for them.